Brighter Colorado Vote Noon Amendment 87 Donate

Colorado · November 2026 ballot

They want a blank check.Don't sign it.

Amendment 87 is the progressive income tax measure, which would be the largest tax hike in Colorado history — $2.7 billion every year — handed to the legislature with almost no strings attached. Brighter Colorado is running the campaign to stop it. We need your help to win.

Colorado already ranks as the third-most-expensive state in the country.

Vote Noon Amendment 87

What Amendment 87 actually does

Four reasons to fight it.

$2.7 billion

A blank check to politicians

Amendment 87 raises $2.7 billion a year and writes the spending plan into statute — not the constitution. The legislature can redirect that money whenever it wants, without ever coming back to voters.

4.4% → 8.4%

The largest tax hike in state history

Colorado's flat 4.4% rate would climb to 7.4% on income above $500,000 and 8.4% above $1 million — for individuals and businesses alike. No tax increase this large has ever been put to Colorado voters.

Seniors & veterans

Deductions could disappear

Because of how Amendment 87 rewrites the constitution, it could force the state to tax all net income — putting Colorado's tax breaks on Social Security, pensions, and military retirement pay at risk.

Jobs & employers

Small businesses head for the exits

Colorado is already the third-most-expensive state, and lost roughly 12,000 residents to other states in a single year. Nearly doubling the rate on employers gives them one more reason to leave — and leaves the bill with everyone who stays.

The fine print

A sloppy attack on TABOR — written to dodge the 55% rule.

A constitutional amendment that adds words needs 55% of the vote to pass. One that only cuts words needs just over 50%. So rather than write a clean tax increase, the drafters went into the constitution and started deleting. Here's what they cut:

"Any income tax law change after July 1, 1992 shall also require all taxable net income to be taxed at one rate with no added surcharge."

What it used to mean

A limit on government: if the state taxes income, it has to tax it at a single, flat rate. That's the protection Colorado voters have kept for more than three decades.

What it could mean now

Strike "at one rate" and the sentence stops limiting how the state taxes and starts requiring that it tax — all taxable net income. Subtractions for Social Security, pensions, and military retirement sit squarely in the way.

The second deletion

They deleted the ban on added taxes.

Amendment 87 strikes two separate phrases out of a single sentence in the constitution, and the second one is easy to miss. Today that sentence requires income to be taxed “with no added tax or surcharge.” Amendment 87 deletes the word tax and leaves only the surcharge ban standing — and nothing in what survives limits who an added tax could reach.

Amendment 87's statutory language marked up in red: the words “at one rate, excluding refund tax credits or voter approved tax credits” and the words “tax or” are struck out, with handwritten notes reading “This means Social Security” and “This means added taxes could be put on everyone's income.”
Exhibit — Amendment 87 statutory languageArticle X, Section 20(8)(a) of the Colorado Constitution as the measure would rewrite it. Struck text is what Amendment 87 removes.
In the constitution today

“Any income tax law change after July 1, 1992 shall also require all taxable net income to be taxed at one rate, excluding refund tax credits or voter approved tax credits, with no added tax or surcharge.”

Two protections in a single sentence: income is taxed at one flat rate, and nothing extra — no added tax, no added surcharge — can be stacked on top of it.

If Amendment 87 passes

“Any income tax law change after July 1, 1992 shall also require all taxable net income to be taxed with no added surcharge.”

The flat rate is gone, and so is the ban on an added tax. A surcharge is still blocked. An added tax is not — and the clause says nothing about income level, so it reaches everyone’s income, not just the top.

A woman sitting at a kitchen table with bills, receipts and a calculator, holding her head in her hands.

Who really pays

"Tax the rich" never stops with the rich.

Colorado's tax base is already concentrated at the top: roughly 27,685 households pay more than a third of all individual income taxes, and individual income taxes fund 59% of the state's General Fund.

When the most mobile taxpayers leave, the shortfall doesn't vanish with them. It gets handed to the families who stay — through higher rates, new fees, or cuts to the services they count on.

34.5%of all individual income taxes paid by the top 1%
59%of the General Fund comes from income taxes
3rdmost expensive state in the country

Our plan to win

Beat their tax hike. Pass our tax cap.

We're not just playing defense. Alongside the campaign against Amendment 87, we're sponsoring Proposition 136 to cap Colorado's income tax rate at 4.4% for individuals and businesses — permanently.

Their measure

Amend. 87 — The tax hike

  • Raises the rate to 7.4% above $500K and 8.4% above $1M
  • $2.7 billion a year in new taxes — the largest hike in state history
  • Puts senior and military-veteran deductions at risk
  • Spending controlled by the legislature, not voters
  • Backed by Bell Policy Center and a coalition of 35 groups on the left
Our measure

Prop. 136 — The 4.4% tax cap

  • Caps the income tax rate at 4.4% for individuals and corporations
  • Delivers a tax cut for Coloradans earning $500K or less
  • Protects TABOR from being chipped away word by word
  • 190,000 signatures already turned in
  • Currently polling 15 points ahead of the tax increase

Why the margin matters: if both measures pass, the one with more votes controls. Winning by a wide margin doesn't just stop the tax hike — it cancels it out and locks the 4.4% cap in place.